The Gang of Six on PGC Board FINALLY got it right!

[Badger]

To ALL NON-Residents of Pennsylvania: If our current PGC Board disturbs you, SO MUCH THE BETTER! Are you landowners here? Do you pay taxes here? Do you live here or VOTE here Legally? IF NOT, what the hell do PA residents care what you BJBS Folks think?

I do NOT care a HOOT IN HELL what Non-Residents of PA think of our PGC Commiisioners. Some "Turkeys" say our PGC Commisioners are "Short Sighted."

I would advise those "numb nuts" that FINALLY our PGC Board is RESPONSIVE to the PA Hunter. Again, IF that upsets NON-RESIDENTS, SO Much the BETTER. When did ANY of those Numb Nuts LAST buy a PA hunting License? WOT? They do not buy hunting licenses? BUT they are SO VOCAL ABOUT PA! Wot, they are NOT shareholders in the PA Hunting License System!

OK, Venado and Altjaeger: What is your LAST Pennsylvania Hunting License Number? For what Year? Wot can you say about what you "Chat about?" Does "Brain Fart" apply to you Texans? LOL! WHEN was Your LAST PA Deer Season? I think our PGC FINALLY Got the Message and things will get better for the PA deer. IF that UPSETS numb nuts TEXANS, Who NEVER hunt in PA, WHO CARES about those Numb Nuts???? Do you have a clue???

Badger

[Altjaeger]

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:: laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

Now that our recent graduate of the seminary, the Reverend Badger has completed his foul mouth, name calling diatribe (I remember when he wanted me removed for calling him a twit, LOL)maybe he will take time to write a rational post telling us what bit of news generated this fine example of English literature.:wink:

Badger and the USP continue to try to destroy scientific deer management in their state despite the good of both the herd and the will of the majority of Pennsylvania hunters, plus the national reputation of hunters. The other members posting here from Pennsylvania, Texas, Louisiana and other states will continue a rational discussion in the meantime.:biggrin:

[kjjm4]

Things weren't "good" for PA deer before herd reduction/antler restrictions. To put it as bluntly as I possibly can, hunting here sucked, unless you happened to enjoy shooting a spike or a 4 point every year. There were too many young bucks being taken, and nowhere near enough does. If the PGC decides to start pandering to a vocal minority of PA hunters and axes the new regulations, they will have made a grave mistake. Science needs to drive wildlife management, not public opinion.

[Renegade]

Agreed kjjm4. Emotion and personal desires should not drive wildlife management.

Badger, you sound pretty frustrated for allegedly having things going "your" way. Jus wot isit you tryn to say? If we don't live along the southern gulf coast then our thoughts on the oil spill are useless, and of no concern? If we don't live or reside in Afghanistan our opinions on the war don't matter? Your resident / non-resident angle is full of holes and is merely a cop-out to answering their legitimate questions. I'm a resident and their concerns seem to be on par with mine. Yet you can't answer my questions either.

AltJaeger - Hey, if Badger wants to look at this as some kind of victory through some rosy colored glasses, that’s his choice. He can spin it to whatever makes him feel happy. But in reality most of these naysayers were destined to become happier as the plan further progressed. And just as it was predicted ahead of time that the PUS would try to spin the results of the audit, they will try to spin the plans results as their doing.
They are really a victim of their own fear. The drummed up false misinformation about some grand scheme to kill all the deer, which was far from any truth, then when the opposite happened, just as the plan was, they think the direction of the plan was turned 180 degrees. When in reality they’re just liking the tail end of the plan but hated and complained about the journey to get to that tail end.

The reality is that the plan, in a nutshell, was to reduce the herd from it’s way overgrown size to a point where growth could rebound and get ahead of demand, and then increase the herd to a size more in balance with the available food. Well the herd was reduced and some growth is rebounding. We’re now at the stage to look at increasing the herd in some spots or keeping it stable in others.
Reducing doe tag allotments was always part of the plan. Not sure how these naysayers missed that part…. Unless they were more concerned with badmouthing a “perceived” government than they were with understanding the actual plan. That would explain their constant cluelessness over the past 10 years.

[venado]

Now that our recent graduate of the seminary, the Reverend Badger has completed his foul mouth, name calling diatribe (I remember when he wanted me removed for calling him a twit, LOL)


I had heard of "new religions" but had not seen the actual representation of them before this. I knew that there were alternative movements attempting to gain ground with flexibility and modernity but based on Badger, alternative religion may be overreaching. I wonder how those actually trained in more conventional US Christian religions such as Catholic, Methodist, Baptist, etc. would respond to situations as posted on a QDM website? I know that I was taught to maintain control of myself and my emotions and to observe my fellow man and to offset my brother's weaknesses by providing him with facts that might convince him of the truth. Though not directly QDM related it would be interesting to know what seminary teaches the lack of emotional control that Badger displays and how they are trained to guide others into believing what they claim as "the truth". Of course Badger may simply not appropriately represent his seminary's training and for that his seminary should not be tarred and feathered because one student strays from the flock.

I really don't know about the skills that Badger can display from whatever seminary he attended but his accounting incompetence was on bold display here some time ago when he didn't understand even basic principles regarding PGC finance and cash flow. I assumed at the time that that came from working for the post office, a government agency well known for its level of efficiency. Now his knowledge of liming and forest regeneration seems to confirm equal incompetency at farming. It appears to me that there is little of value to be learned from this postal accounting wizard (PAW) / farmer / preacher, and where he claims to live has nothing to do with that conclusion.

[southtexas]

It has entertainment value...:smile:

[Altjaeger]

I guess that after recovering from Memorial Day celebrations Badger has no further explanation of what he was trying to say or explanation of what generated the garbled post.;)

[Renegade]

That's how the PUS gang rolls on these websites. Posts a bunch of garble without explanation as fast as you can and then run. Look at that kid a while back "pgcsux" or whichever handle he used this time. What else do you do when you have nothing solid to back your comments. Aaa but they come and go once shown to be blowing smoke.

[venado]

explanation of what generated the garbled post


Could it have been a result of the BJ part of his BJBS?:confused1:

[Laturkeyhtr]

It has entertainment value... :)

My sentiments exactly. Now when is Badger going to come back to this thread and give us some more input?

[Renegade]

Now when is Badger going to come back to this thread and give us some more input? It would be refreshing to get some "input" instead of just unsubstantiated BS, or as Badger likes to say "BJBS"! (not sure what that stands for. Have a guess but it makes no sense)

[Laturkeyhtr]

I haven't been in here in almost two months and Badger still hasn't stepped back in to "keep us informed." Unless of course he explained it somewhere else while I was away.